EAC changed expert report on voter fraud
The New York Times reports: A federal panel responsible for conducting election research played down the findings of experts who concluded last year that there was little voter fraud around the nation, according to a review of the original report obtained by The New York Times.
Instead, the panel, the Election Assistance Commission, issued a report that said the pervasiveness of fraud was open to debate.
The revised version echoes complaints made by Republican politicians, who have long suggested that voter fraud is widespread and justifies the voter identification laws that have been passed in at least two dozen states.
Democrats say the threat is overstated and have opposed voter identification laws, which they say disenfranchise the poor, members of minority groups and the elderly, who are less likely to have photo IDs and are more likely to be Democrats. -- Panel Said to Alter Finding on Voter Fraud - New York Times
Comments
The EAC also released a statement on April 11, 2007 stating that it will be more "careful" in the future in how it selects contractors for studies since people view the EAC as "authoritative". http://www.eac.gov/docs/2007-%2011%20(%204-11-07%20)%20Statement%20on%20Research%20&%20Contracting%20Policies.pdf
This is bad news. The style of appointments being bipartisan already virtually assures that no clear blowing of the whistle will occur against either party, without a probable 2-2 tie on the Commission. Further caution in this area will turn scholarship into milquetoast and water down the truth even further.
Posted by: Paul Lehto
|
April 12, 2007 10:19 AM