Split precincts cause problems
Rep Craig Ford writes about the consequences of the Republican gerrymander of the Legislature: But under our new district lines, the Legislature took this a step further by "packing" the districts represented by African-American legislators with as many black voters as possible. Legislators again claimed the purpose of this was to ensure that an African-American would be elected to represent that district. But African-Americans were already representing these districts at their previous levels. There was no need to add black voters to these districts. The second argument, and the one that is most relevant to what happened in District 89, has been that these districts divide "communities of interest." Communities of interests can include counties, cities and towns. But most importantly, the new districts split voting precincts.
Splitting these communities dilutes their voice in government. For example, the more times a county is divided the less influence it will have with a particular legislator. This also causes problems when trying to get local bills passed, since local bills have to be signed off on by every member of the delegation. The more divided the county, the more legislators who have to approve of the legislation, even if that legislator only has a small portion of that county in his or her district.
In House District 89, poll workers at one of the split precincts unintentionally gave the wrong ballot to more than 200 voters. But even though it was an honest mistake, that mistake now means that those 200 voters will have to spend the next four years with a representative they did not vote for.
Making this situation even worse, the difference between the candidates in this race is less than 100 votes. Meaning, the voters who received the wrong ballot could have completely altered the outcome. -- Case shows redistricting damage
Disclosure: I am one of the plaintiffs’ counsel in the case, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, now pending in the US Supreme Court.