Will presidential candidates show up in the South's "SEC primary"?
The Washington Post reports: Strategists say a Southern primary has the potential to buoy a more conservative candidate and be a challenge for candidates considered too moderate or too affiliated with the establishment -- such as Jeb Bush, who will not denounce the loathed Common Core education standards and has taken a more moderate stance on immigration.
Several Southern states have high rates of poverty and could benefit from an infusion of jobs, although Republicans in the region also like to rail against social welfare programs, and Obamacare is still wildly unpopular. There are worries about terrorism and a desire for an aggressive commander in chief. Evangelical voters are also a major force and are looking for a candidate who will not back down in opposing gay marriage and abortion. ...
But if the South builds an SEC primary, will candidates show up? Or will the attention still go to the biggest states or purplest states?
"No one can really afford a 50-state strategy anymore," said Angie Maxwell, director of the Diane D. Blair Center of Southern Politics and Society at the University of Arkansas. "The truth is, the strategists don't need the South. .. The Republican Party is going to get the South, no matter who the nominee is. That's not a danger. I mean, they voted for a millionaire Mormon."
The last time there was this sort of early Southern primary was 1988, when Democrats still controlled the region. The goal was to boost a moderate Democrat, such as then-Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, who could be more competitive in the general election. Instead, Al Gore won five of the states and Jesse Jackson took the other five. The same could happen for the Republicans in 2016, strategists caution.
But Kemp remains hopeful: "The South is the new heartland of America. The road to the White House should run through the South." -- As ?SEC primary? takes shape, will presidential contenders show up? - The Washington Post