<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Votelaw, Edward Still&apos;s blog on law and politics</title>
      <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:15:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.35</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Birmingham: judge rules that councilwoman is legally holding office</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Birmingham News reports:</strong>  A Jefferson County Judge this afternoon dismissed a lawsuit claiming Birmingham  City Councilwoman Valerie Abbott was serving illegally because she works for a utility.<br />
 <br />
In his lawsuit filed in October 2009, Paul Latino asked the judge to remove Abbott from office and reimburse him for any taxes he paid that went toward her salary. At  issue was Abbott's full-time job at AT&T. Latino's lawyers said her employment with the utility violates portions of the Mayor/Council Act and the Alabama Code.</p>

<p>In addition, the suit cited a section in the State Code as well as Section 8.06 of the Mayor Council Act, which prohibits a council member from working for a utility while in office.  ...</p>

<p>Abbott called criticism about her employment misguided. Although she works at AT&T, she officially works for BellSouth Affiliate Services Corp., a spin-off company from the utility that does not provide phone service or is a regulated utility. In his ruling, Judge William Noble agreed with Abbott's defense .<strong>  -- Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="Jefferson County judge tosses suit arguing Birmingham Councilwoman Valerie Abbott serves illegally | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2010/08/jefferson_county_judge_tosses.html">Jefferson County judge tosses suit arguing Birmingham Councilwoman Valerie Abbott serves illegally | al.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006431.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006431.html</guid>
         <category>Candidate qualification</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:15:43 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Montgomery Co, Ala: GOP push poll upsetting the Dem candidate</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Montgomery Advertiser reports:</strong>  A contender for a local seat in the Alabama House of Represen­tatives is up in arms about a poll run by Republicans in his dis­trict that he said inaccurately tells people he defended corrupt politicians and sued local busi­nesses as an attorney.</p>

<p>Democrat Joe Hubbard is challenging Republican state Rep. David Grimes for the Dis­trict 73 seat.</p>

<p>Hubbard has voiced his con­cerns that the question asking if people would be more or less likely to support him if they knew "Joe Hubbard is a lawyer who has sued local businesses and has defended many corrupt Montgomery politicians."</p>

<p>Hubbard said he has never represented Montgomery pub­lic officials or sued local busi­nesses. He considers it a push poll -- a type of poll that, instead of being done to obtain opinions, asks loaded and unfounded questions that contain negative information about a candidate in an attempt to influence vot­ers.  <strong>Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="District 73 candidate upset over questions in GOP poll | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser" href="http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20100822/NEWS02/8220338/1009">District 73 candidate upset over questions in GOP poll | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006430.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006430.html</guid>
         <category>Campaigning</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:48:06 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Australia: how are the votes cast and counted?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2010/">ABC of Australia</a> is predicting a hung Parliament -- meaning no party has a majority.  To get the official totals go to the Australian Electoral Commission's <a href="http://vtr.aec.gov.au/Default.htm">Virtual Tally Room.</a></p>

<p>What are the mechanics of voting?  For the answer to that, go to the AEC's <a href="http://www.aec.gov.au/Voting/index.htm">Voting page.</a></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006429.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006429.html</guid>
         <category>Foreign</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:10:29 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Bessemer, Ala: mayoral candidate uses fake photo and endorsement; campaign manager confesses to hoax</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Birmingham News reported on 18 August:</strong>  Bessemer Councilwoman Dorothy Davidson is distributing a flier for her mayoral campaign that includes the top photo. Davidson claims Alabama football coach Nick Saban is endorsing her campaign, but the Alabama athletics staff says no endorsement was made. Davidson acknowledged Tuesday night a photo shown below of Saban and his wife, Terry, from 2007 was altered to include her. </p>

<p>For a political hopeful in Alabama, it could be the ultimate endorsement -- a show of support from University of Alabama football coach Nick Saban.</p>

<p>Bessemer Councilwoman Dorothy Davidson, who is running for mayor of the city, claims she secured Saban's endorsement of her campaign three weeks ago. Davidson printed it on a color campaign flier that shows her and the coach smiling side by side on a golf course.</p>

<p>But University of Alabama athletics officials on Tuesday said there is no such endorsement. And the photo of Davidson and Saban together is not real, but digitally altered from another photo.  ...</p>

<p>Davidson, when contacted about the campaign ad and photo on Tuesday afternoon, at first said the image of her and Saban together was real and taken about three weeks ago. However, when presented later with a 2007 photo of Saban and his wife that appears to be the base photo onto which Davidson's image was added, the candidate acknowledged that her image was digitally added to the 2007 photo.  <strong>Read the whole story --></strong>  <a title="Bessemer mayoral candidate Dorothy Davidson claims Nick Saban endorsement, passing out fliers with altered photo | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2010/08/nick_saban_bessemer_candidate.html">Bessemer mayoral candidate Dorothy Davidson claims Nick Saban endorsement, passing out fliers with altered photo | al.com</a></p>

<p><strong>And on 19 August:</strong>  The man who has been managing Bessemer Councilwoman Dorothy Davidson's campaign for mayor this afternoon said he tricked Davidson into believing she had an endorsement from University of Alabama football coach Nick Saban.</p>

<p>Kevin Morris, 35, said he is responsible for the campaign flier that features a digitally altered picture of Davidson and Saban and touts an endorsement by the coach.</p>

<p>Morris said he told Davidson the photo of the coach and his wife, Terry, was actually of Saban and his mother. He said he told Davidson that Saban had OK'd the altering of the photograph.</p>

<p>"I lied," Morris said. "She (Davidson) didn't do anything wrong."   <strong>-- Read the whole story -->  </strong>http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2010/08/bessemer_mayoral_candidates_ca.html<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006428.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006428.html</guid>
         <category>Campaigning</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:13:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>RNC changes the presidential primary calendar</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hotline On Call reports:</strong>  The RNC has approved a resolution making dramatic changes to the way the GOP picks a presidential nominee, moving primaries to later dates and requiring states to allocate their delegates on a proportional basis.</p>

<p>The proposal will move the earliest nominating contests -- in IA, NH, SC and NV -- back from early Jan. to Feb. It will also require states that hold nominating contests in March to award delegates based on the proportion of votes candidates win, eliminating the prospect of an early winner-take-all state that would effectively end the nominating process.</p>

<p>Proponents said the measure would avoid the calamity of a national primary. Already, nearly 40 states have primaries scheduled for the first possible day in the nominating calendar.  ...</p>

<p>In practice, the new rules will require GOP WH candidates to place more emphasis on grassroots organizing. Candidates will have to build their campaigns in dozens of states, rather than focusing solely on raising money for TV ads. What's more, primaries won't be held so close to the winter holidays.<strong>  Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="RNC Passes Calendar Reform - Hotline On Call" href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/08/rnc_passes_cale.php">RNC Passes Calendar Reform - Hotline On Call</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006425.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006425.html</guid>
         <category>Pres. Primary schedule</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 10:29:06 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lauderdale County: referendum on separate commission chair and probate judge</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Times Daily reports:</strong>  Lauderdale County voters will decide in November if they want to separate the commission chairmanship from the probate judge.</p>

<p>Florence attorney Chris Smith, counsel for the Lauderdale County Commission, said he received written approval from the U.S. Justice Department.  ...</p>

<p>A bill, allowing the public to vote on the issue, was introduced by state Rep. Mike Curtis, D-Greenhill, during the 2010 legislative session.</p>

<p>County officials said the ballot will prompt voters to decide if they want two people to handle the positions.<strong>  Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="Voters to decide on chair, probate judge separation | TimesDaily.com | The Times Daily | Florence, AL" href="http://www.timesdaily.com/article/20100805/news/100809937">Voters to decide on chair, probate judge separation | TimesDaily.com | The Times Daily | Florence, AL</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006423.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006423.html</guid>
         <category>Candidate qualification</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:10:23 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: black voters file Section 5 case over Gov. Riley cancelling their votes (complaint attached)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Tuscaloosa News reports:</strong>  Local politicians in Greene and Macon counties have joined to file a federal lawsuit claiming that Gov. Bob Riley's bingo raids are perpetuating racial injustice by thwarting the intent of black voters.</p>

<p>The suit, filed Thursday, was intended to reopen Greenetrack and avoid a raid at Victory-Land in Macon County. The raid appears imminent after the state Supreme Court on Friday gave the governor's anti-gambling task force a green light.</p>

<p>Voting rights lawyer Ed Still is one of several attorneys who filed the lawsuit over the June raid and confiscation of more than 800 bingo machines from the Greenetrack bingo casino in Greene County.</p>

<p>Still said on Friday that Riley never got clearance from the U.S. Justice Department to take action against Greene and Macon counties, which have local constitutional amendments approved by voters authorizing bingo.</p>

<p>The lawsuit's premise is simple: Riley's actions reversed voter intentions in both counties, effectively canceling their votes.<strong>  Read the whole story -->  </strong> <a title="Suit claims bingo raids thwart black voters | TuscaloosaNews.com" href="http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20100731/news/100739969">Suit claims bingo raids thwart black voters | TuscaloosaNews.com</a></p>

<p><a title="View Johnson v. Riley (Voting Rights Act Complaint) on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35198456/Johnson-v-Riley-Voting-Rights-Act-Complaint" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;">Johnson v. Riley (Voting Rights Act Complaint)</a> <object id="doc_237100729210529" name="doc_237100729210529" height="500" width="100%" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" style="outline:none;" rel="media:document" resource="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=35198456&access_key=key-12o8rxr04u3dj2pczpqz&page=1&viewMode=list" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/media/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" > <param name="movie" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf"> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"> <param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> <param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=35198456&access_key=key-12o8rxr04u3dj2pczpqz&page=1&viewMode=list"> <embed id="doc_237100729210529" name="doc_237100729210529" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=35198456&access_key=key-12o8rxr04u3dj2pczpqz&page=1&viewMode=list" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="500" width="100%" wmode="opaque" bgcolor="#ffffff"></embed> </object> <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006419.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006419.html</guid>
         <category>Voting Rights Act</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:26:30 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama&apos;s judicial campaign finance law unenforced for 15 years</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Birmingham News reports:</strong>  A 15-year-old state law meant to discourage big­-dollar donations to judicial cam­paigns has never been enforced, and each of the three branches of government in Montgomery blames another for the failure.</p>

<p>The attorney general says the state court system is supposed to come up with rules for enforce­ment; the state court system says the law first needs the blessing of the U.S. Justice Department, which the AG's office has not sought; and a legislative sponsor of the law says he'd be happy to rewrite it if someone would tell him what's wrong with it.</p>

<p>"Only the combined forces of the three branches of government  could create such a confusing situ­ation," said Mark White, a Bir­mingham lawyer who led the 1996 review of the law and found sev­eral problems that make it hard to enforce.</p>

<p>A federal lawsuit filed last week asks that the law be formally blocked until the Justice Depart­ment can review it, contending that, as the situation stands now, the law could be haphazardly en­forced.  <strong>Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="Alabama judicial campaigns law unenforced for 15 years | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/sweethome/2010/08/alabama_campaign_law_unenforce.html">Alabama judicial campaigns law unenforced for 15 years | al.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006418.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006418.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign finance</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:22:14 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama needs instant-runoff voting</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Alec Slatky begins his op-ed in the Birmingham News:</strong>  The contentious Republican runoff for governor between Bradley Byrne and Robert Bentley has many Alabama political leaders thinking about possible reforms to the election process. Wary of an influx of Democratic voters who might decide the nomination contrarily to the preferences of the Republican Party and its members, GOP officials considered instituting a cross-over rule -- the Alabama Democratic Party already has one -- that would ban anyone who voted on a Democratic ballot in the primary from opting for a Republican ballot in the runoff. </p>

<p>The timing was too close for any changes to be made, and Bentley ended up winning by a 56-44 percent margin. But one potential reform for future primaries could resolve many problems with the status quo: instant runoff voting.</p>

<p>Instant runoff voting is designed to simulate a runoff election, but without the drawbacks of runoffs: low voter turnout, high cost to taxpayers, negative campaigning and potential for the lack of a crossover rule to lead to unrepresentative party nominees. It's been adopted to replace two rounds of voting in such cities as Oakland, Minneapolis and Memphis; has a long record of use in elections in dozens of major associations; and is used for overseas voters in Arkansas, Louisiana and South Carolina.</p>

<p>Voters rank candidates in order of preference, and if no candidate reaches the required threshold -- 50 percent in Alabama -- the top two candidates advance to a runoff, which can be held instantly. Ballots cast for the eliminated candidates are added to the totals of the runoff candidates based on whichever runoff candidate is ranked next on the ballot. That's it -- no need for a second election.  Read the whole piece -->  <a title="MY VIEW: True voting reform tops crossover rule | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/birmingham-news-commentary/2010/07/my_view_true_voting_reform_top.html">MY VIEW: True voting reform tops crossover rule | al.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006417.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006417.html</guid>
         <category>Election systems</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:38:59 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: suit filed to block enforcement of law on campaign contributions</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Birmingham News reports:</strong>  A 15-year-old Alabama law that says judges should not hear cases in which one of the parties donated at least $2,000 to their campaigns has never been enforced, locked in a stalemate over whether it first needs to be reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice for evidence that it would not disenfranchise minorities.<br />
   <br />
  A lawsuit filed this week in Washington by an Anniston City Council member tries to settle the question, but it also raises more questions about how an act of the Alabama Legislature can essentially be ignored for so long.<br />
  <br />
  The 1995 law says that a circuit judge who received at least $2,000 from one of the people involved in the case -- or $4,000 for an appellate judge -- must recuse himself in order to avoid the "appearance of impropriety."<br />
  <br />
  Soon after it was passed, the Alabama attorney general's office submitted the law to the Department of Justice, which normally reviews all changes to Alabama's election laws under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. But before the Justice Department could make a decision, the attorney general at the time, Jeff Sessions, withdrew the request for review and notified Washington that the state would enforce the new law and that it didn't need preclearance from the DOJ.  <strong>-- Read the whole story --></strong>  <a title="Lawsuit seeks Justice Department review of unenforced 15-year-old state law | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/sweethome/2010/07/lawsuit_seeks_justice_departme.html">Lawsuit seeks Justice Department review of unenforced 15-year-old state law | al.com</a></p>

<p>A copy of the complaint is shown below:</p>

<p><a title="View Little v. King Complaint on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/34713615/Little-v-King-Complaint" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;">Little v. King Complaint</a> <object id="doc_753896134582073" name="doc_753896134582073" height="500" width="100%" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" style="outline:none;" rel="media:document" resource="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=34713615&access_key=key-2o7on3c606sgkyy60jet&page=1&viewMode=list" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/media/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" > <param name="movie" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf"> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"> <param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> <param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=34713615&access_key=key-2o7on3c606sgkyy60jet&page=1&viewMode=list"> <embed id="doc_753896134582073" name="doc_753896134582073" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=34713615&access_key=key-2o7on3c606sgkyy60jet&page=1&viewMode=list" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="500" width="100%" wmode="opaque" bgcolor="#ffffff"></embed> </object> <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006416.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006416.html</guid>
         <category>Voting Rights Act</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:04:36 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: ADC files judicial-inquiry complaint against circuit judge over campaign flyer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Montgomery Advertiser reports:</strong>  The Alabama Democratic Conference has filed a complaint against Circuit Court Judge Patricia Warner over what the organization's chairman said are questionable and misleading campaign tactics.</p>

<p>Joe Reed, chairman of the ADC, has filed a complaint with the Judicial Inquiry Commission, alleging that a campaign flier produced by Warner as part of her re-election campaign improperly implied the state organization had endorsed her.</p>

<p>Reed said the action was a violation of the state's fair campaign practices law and the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics.  ...</p>

<p>A complaint to the Judicial Inquiry Commission is serious business. The commission's mandated function is to investigate allegations of misconduct in office, violations of the Canons of Judicial Ethics or of disability made against any judge of the court, according to a document of the state Records Commission.<strong>  -- Read the whole article -->  </strong><a title="ADC files complaint against judge over ad | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser" href="http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20100720/NEWS02/7200322/ADC-files-complaint-against-judge-over-ad">ADC files complaint against judge over ad | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006415.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006415.html</guid>
         <category>Campaigning</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:00:19 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: election-reporting system tested in runoff, to be ready for general election</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Mobile Press Register reports:</strong>  Elections officials have announced plans to launch a rapid new online vote reporting-system statewide for November's elections, following a largely successful test during Tuesday's primary runoffs.</p>

<p>The Election Night Reporting system is billed by the Secretary of State's Office as a way to bring Alabama elections "into the 21st century." It is expected to offer voting results, turnout information and possibly precinct-by-precinct data, all online and updated regularly through the night after polls close.  ...</p>

<p>On Tuesday, election officials sought to test the system in Alabama's four largest counties: Mobile, Montgomery, Jefferson and Madison.</p>

<p>Apparently, the night's biggest difficulty came from the county in which the Secretary of State's Office is located. "Unfortunately, we weren't able to participate," said Trey Granger, director of elections for Montgomery County. "Our Internet went down." <strong> -- Read the entire story -->  </strong><a title="New Alabama election system to show statewide results online | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/live/2010/07/new_alabama_election_system_to.html">New Alabama election system to show statewide results online | al.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006414.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006414.html</guid>
         <category>Election administration</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:22:02 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Autauga Co: DA finds no multiple voting occurred</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Montgomery Advertiser reports:</strong>  District At­torney Randall Houston has for­warded his report about poten­tial voting irregularities during Autauga County's June 1 prima­ry elections to the secretary of state's office.</p>

<p>The issue came to light when a voter's name appeared on the list of those having cast absen­tee ballots when the person did not vote absentee. The Autauga County board of registrars made a complaint to the district attor­ney's office, alleging that voter had cast three votes in the pri­mary, Houston said.</p>

<p>"My office has determined that there was no indication of voter fraud in Autauga County, and there was only one vote cast by the person who was alleged to have voted several times," Houston wrote in a letter accom­panying the report. "However, it appears there was an error with the computer system which monitors absentee voting. There are three possible scenar­ios as to what might have oc­curred in the Autauga County primary and they include: un­lawful human intervention, simple human error, or a mal­function in the computer soft­ware."</p>

<p>Houston wrote that the secre­tary of state's office is best equipped to determine if any problems with the computer system exist.<strong>  -- Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="Autauga County report on voting irregularities sent to secretary of state's office | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser" href="http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20100716/NEWS01/7160308/1007/rss02">Autauga County report on voting irregularities sent to secretary of state's office | montgomeryadvertiser.com | Montgomery Advertiser</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006413.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006413.html</guid>
         <category>Election administration</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:50:31 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: editorial warns GOP about crossover voting (or closing the barn door after ...)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Huntsville Times editorializes:</strong>  Be careful what you ask for. It may not be what you really want.</p>

<p>Alabama Republicans need to ask themselves what they really want in the wake of Tuesday's GOP gubernatorial runoff between Bradley Byrne and Robert Bentley that drew lots of Democrats.</p>

<p>Such crossover voting is prohibited by Alabama Democratic Party rules. Republicans have no such ban in primary runoffs.</p>

<p>The state has come full circle on this.</p>

<p>Several election cycles ago, Republicans were the ones "crossing over" to vote in the Democratic gubernatorial runoff.<strong>  -- Read the whole editorial -->  </strong><a title="EDITORIAL: Political parties and election rules | al.com" href="http://blog.al.com/times-views/2010/07/editorial_political_parties_an.html">EDITORIAL: Political parties and election rules | al.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006412.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006412.html</guid>
         <category>Voter qualification</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:27:01 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Alabama: winning candidate withdraws because of campaign-finance violation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Cullman Times reports:</strong>  With the shadow of an election violation hanging over his campaign, Jerry Parker captured the most votes in the Republican runoff Tuesday. But in a dramatic turn moments after the totals were announced, he declined to accept the party's nomination.</p>

<p>Parker said he had learned from the state attorney general's office that his failure to file a portion of his campaign financing papers on time could not be overlooked or amended.  ...</p>

<p>I told you in the beginning I was no politician. I will stand on my principles; I take full responsibility for my actions. This is my fault and my fault alone. Unlike others, I will not cost the county I love so dearly one cent by fighting a lawsuit I can’t win.</p>

<p>“I want to see the Republican Party get on with the business of running my party, the party of Reagan. Therefore, I cannot and will not accept the Republican Party’s nomination for associate commissioner. God bless America and God bless Cullman County,” Parker finished.<strong>  --  Read the whole story -->  </strong><a title="Commission shocker » Top News » CullmanTimes.com, Cullman, Alabama" href="http://www.cullmantimes.com/local/x540031721/Election-results-coming">Commission shocker » Top News » CullmanTimes.com, Cullman, Alabama</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006411.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.votelaw.com/blog/archives/006411.html</guid>
         <category>Campaign finance</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:12:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
